HOME.DANCING.EBAY SHOP.ALL SORTS.ANGELS.ANGEL CARDS.FREE PDF's.MATSON.CONTACT.
Carol Matson
Bookmark and Share

carol@healingthroughself.co.uk   © All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Hidden History of the Human Race By Michael Cremo  Free PDF

Hidden History of the Human Race By Michael Cremo

 

Click Here to Download PDF Excellent Book

 

n Part I of The Hidden History of the Human Race, we look closely at the vast

 

amount of controversial evidence that contradicts current ideas about human evolution. We

 

recount in detail how this evidence has been systematically suppressed, ignored, or

 

forgotten, even though it is qualitatively (and quantitatively) equivalent to the evidence

 

favoring currently accepted views on human origins. When we speak of suppression of

 

evidence, we are not referring to scientific conspirators carrying out a satanic plot to

 

deceive the public. Instead, we are talking about an ongoing social process of knowledge

 

filtration that appears quite innocuous but has a substantial cumulative effect. Certain

 

categories of evidence simply disappear from view, in our opinion unjustifiably.

 

This pattern of data suppression has been going on for a long time. In 1880, J. D.

 

Whitney, the state geologist of California, published a lengthy review of advanced stone

 

tools found in California gold mines. The implements, including spear points and stone

 

mortars and pestles, were found deep in mine shafts, underneath thick, undisturbed layers

 

of lava, in formations ranging from 9 million to over 55 million years old. W. H. Holmes of

 

the Smithsonian Institution, one of the most vocal critics of the California finds, wrote:

 

"Perhaps if Professor Whitney had fully appreciated the story of human evolution as it is

 

understood today, he would have hesitated to announce the conclusions formulated [that

 

humans existed in very ancient times in North America], notwithstanding the imposing

 

array of testimony with which he was confronted." In other words, if the facts do not agree

 

with the favoured theory, then such facts, even an imposing array of them, must be

 

discarded.